QUICKHELP




City of Johannesburg

CITICHAT
Neil Fraser
Neil Fraser

About CitiChat
Neil Fraser is a partner in 'Neil Fraser & Associates trading as Urban Inc.' an urban consultancy dedicated to the revitalisation and regeneration of cities and of the inner city of Johannesburg in particular. He can be contacted at (083) 456 0242 or (011) 444-4895 or by e-mail at neil@urbaninc.co.za.

Citichat is a free weekly publication concerning cities generally and Johannesburg specifically. Please forward Citichat to your colleagues who may wish to be placed on the subscription list. To subscribe please contact us at info@urbaninc.co.za.


READ previous editions of CitiChat

Neil Fraser - passionate city man
HE'S got a full white beard and moustache to match his white hair, he smiles often, and he's passionate about cities, particularly Johannesburg . . . he's Neil Fraser, executive director of the Central Johannesburg Partnership (CJP), an inner city renewal initiative
Read more

Joburg's heritage
Discover Joburg's secret character with our features on the city's many diverse suburbs and places
Click here

ALSO: Johannesburg's early history

What of the
future of downtown?

AS PEOPLE moved to the suburbs, shops and businesses followed. Many efforts to restore city centres across the US and Europe have failed, with many valuable lessons to learn.

Neil Fraser

May 30, 2005

I HAVE not had time yet to study the budget delivered by Executive Mayor Councillor Amos Masondo on Wednesday, 25 May. However, from the brief reports I have read it looks good. It appears to provide the wherewithal to increase the momentum developed over the past five years while addressing some of the city's critical needs. It is certainly great to see the massive (31,5 percent) increase in the capital budget.

Places and spaces 1 "Places have an impact on our sense of self, our sense of safety, the kind of work we get done, the ways we interact with other people, even our ability to function as citizens in a democracy. In short, the places where we spend time affect the people we are and can become."

The experience of place
Over the next couple of weeks I want to have a look at how we measure up regarding public space - surely a critical ingredient in our quest for world class city status. There are a number of debates taking place at present, ranging from the proposed square within the Gauteng Provincial Government Precinct to the informal trading structures that have been erected recently on many of the city's pavements to transit streets such as Eloff Street and pedestrianised streets such as Hill Street in Randburg.

Let's start with the last two and firstly look at what has happened in relation to such street interventions in cities in North America and, to a lesser extent, in Western Europe. Certainly there are clear parallels for us with the USA in the background to the development of pedestrian and semi-pedestrian streets.

In the American city of the late nineteenth century, retail was the magnet that drew people downtown and was the glue that held it together. The most critical part of that magnet and glue was the department store - the downtown department store became the engine for mass merchandising. It did this by capitalising on the increase in urban populations and in personal wealth, bringing these two aspects together to absorb the output of the then new phenomenon of large scale manufacturing.

Department stores
Department stores acted as educators of the rapidly emerging American middle class by providing elaborate displays that showed their clientele how to dress, how to furnish homes, and so forth, while providing choice by clearly indicating price and quality. Department stores made shopping quite magnificent by providing spaces that were palatial in design. Department stores tried to make shopping fun.

They targeted women, treating them as their major customers and focusing on how to make them comfortable. This attracted huge numbers of middle-class women downtown, who spent a substantial amount of time on shopping trips. As more potential buyers thronged the pavements so speciality shops, restaurants and variety stores created shopping thoroughfares around the big department stores.

Local authorities concentrated on the streetscapes so that stores and streets together made downtown a cleaner and safer place for everyone.

By the turn of the nineteenth century, the heart of most big cities was the retail district. The attraction of more and more people downtown had an important effect on transportation technology. The horse-cart was succeeded by the electric trolley and then by the subway - all designed to bring the mass market to the downtown retailer.

The end of the Second World War in 1945 changed the US city's domination of the retail market. Returning war veterans were given cheap housing grants that resulted in the number of housing starts accelerating from 300 000 a year before the war to one million in 1946 and two million by 1950.

However, the new home owners wanted single-family homes in areas that were not crowded and so elected to move into the suburbs rather than make their homes in the dense cities. Cars were cheap, petrol even cheaper and the population's dependence on public transport started to wane dramatically.

Moving to the suburbs
Companies began moving to the suburbs, where their executives lived, manufacturing followed and, in turn, retail started to follow. By the early 1960s department stores were closing their doors in downtowns and reopening them in the suburbs. Cities were in decline and considered by many to be obsolete.

The emergence of decentralised shopping malls in the 1950s was to be the final nail in the coffin for many downtowns. They were places planned around the consumer and were more attractive than the bustle and helter-skelter of the cities' main streets. They also offered one-stop convenience in spacious, weatherproof surroundings. Consumers could shop at their leisure and comfort instead of travelling downtown with all its irritations and delays - and then having to walk through crowded and noisy streets. Shopping centres became sanctuaries for shopping.

The cities fought back. Cities all over the US, in the UK, Europe and Australia, started to develop dedicated pedestrian streets as they believed that the complete separation of pedestrians and vehicular movement created the most attractive environment for people, as well as served the retailers.

Spiro Kostof, The City Assembled, reflects that, "Downtown business leaders and city officials fought the flood of shopping malls with elaborate pedestrian street schemes and the Malling of Main Street began in earnest.

"The earliest examples come from Kalamazoo, Michigan, Miami Beach, and Pomona, California. In these and dozens of other towns, asphalt was replaced by concrete or tile pavements, punctuated by shade trees and planter boxes, fountains, benches and kiosks. It is an artificial and sanitised design vocabulary, launched with much fanfare, but without a coherent long range programme of urban improvement ... by the 1980s the fad had lost its steam."

Failure of pedestrian malls
The fad had lost its steam and so in the 1980s we find the following reports appearing in the media: "Pedestrian malls twenty years later" - "Some 150 pedestrian malls - including transit malls - have been built in the United States in the last two decades. Most have failed outright, but a few have lived up to their billing as the salvation of downtown retailing.

"Just about as many department stores and first-run movie theatres have closed in towns with malls as without, and just as many wig-stores, fast food places and video game arcades have opened up." (Planning Magazine, December 1982.

An article in the New York Times on 13 December 1987 entitled "Replacing the downtown mall with traffic" noted that "Eugene, Oregon; Independence, Missouri; Jackson, Michigan; and Champaign, Illinois have turned their malls back into streets again and several other cities, including Chicago, Illinois and Decatur, Illinois, are studying major redesigns of their downtown malls."

Laurie M Grossman writing in The Wall Street Journal in June 1987 stated that most of the pedestrian malls, "failed to reverse the decline - and in some cases hastened it", adding that, "city pedestrian malls fail to fulfill the promise of revitalising downtown".

Roberta Grandez Gratz in The Living City states that, "the pedestrian mall was one of the early planning gimmicks offered as quick-fix solution for economically troubled downtowns that does not address fundamental reasons for downtown activity".

Western Europe
In the post-war years in Western Europe, city planners had experimented with the transformation of certain business streets into pedestrian thoroughfares. These projects proved successful and were duplicated across Europe.

In Germany alone there were 63 pedestrianised areas by 1966, 182 by 1972 and 370 by 1977. One of the most extensive of these systems is in Nuremberg, where the pedestrian streets are supplemented by a dense network of shopping arcades and public parks.

Another well-known and successful example is the Stroget in Copenhagen, where five existing streets running from the Town Hall to the city's central square have been linked and kept free of motorised traffic.

Today many cities in Western Europe and the United Kingdom boast highly successful pedestrian areas. However, they seldom, if ever, created isolated pedestrian retail malls. Instead, they went for extensive city centre pedestrianisation in strong mixed-use areas.

In the United Kingdom and Western Europe many of these areas are located in the historic urban cores. Some of the most well known and successful dedicated pedestrian ways such as Las Ramblas, Barcelona, are flanked by roadways.

The United States
Back to the States and a fairly recent publication. Creating a Vibrant City Centre by Cy Paumier comments on "Dedicated pedestrian streets".

"In North America, the pedestrian mall was introduced to help save declining retail districts that were being outperformed by the suburban malls which offered pedestrian amenities and free parking. But subsequent studies of how people use urban spaces show that the exclusion of vehicular traffic or the separation of vehicular and pedestrian systems is not necessary or even desirable.

"Indeed, removing all vehicular traffic from selected streets or giving the street over to vehicles and creating a system of skywalks for pedestrian movement can be counterproductive."

Closing the city centre's retail spine to vehicles and converting it to a pedestrian street was an inadequate response to the broader economic problem of how to strengthen the centre's retail uses.

The effort often failed not because the idea of enhancing the central area's identity as a place for people was misguided, but because the basic concept ignored a number of fundamental requirements for city centre retail regeneration. These requirements include:

New activity generators to draw more people to the central area, establishing a new base of market support; a merchandising mix that is more competitive with suburban centres; and links among all the city centre's major generators to foster market synergy among uses and street access and visibility, which are eliminated when a mall is created.

Weak retail mix
Although the pedestrian mall concept attracted shoppers, it failed to keep them coming back because its land use and retail mix were weak. Many pedestrian streets also failed largely because their design - especially in the earlier years - ignored the special character of the urban street.

Instead of emphasizing the traditional street's architecture, sense of human scale, spatial enclosure and linear continuity, the design of the pedestrian street often took the elements that characterised the public spaces of suburban shopping centres - berms, informal planting areas, raised planters, fixed seating, fountains and play sculptures - and used them to fill the street space.

Often, the scale of pedestrian space created by closing the street to vehicles presented a problem. Compared with a traditional shopping area, the pedestrian street, when vehicles were excluded, seemed to be out of scale with the volume of pedestrians, leaving it looking empty rather than lively and bustling with activity.

Many pedestrian streets also failed on a more detailed design level because they used paving material, street furniture and planting approaches that impaired the space's flexibility for use for a variety of functions, created a sense of visual clutter and ignored the goals of durability and maintainability.

Lessons
The application of suburban design concepts to city centre spaces was destined to fail because it did not recognise the essential characteristics that make the urban street an attractive and social space. Most US cities removed their pedestrian malls when public officials and property owners realised the need for accessibility and visibility.

This failure carries two important lessons for designers of the city centre's pedestrian system.

It is dangerous to import imitative solutions unless the basic conditions that contributed to the original success are clearly present in the city centre.

The special characteristics and resources of the city centre can enhance its identity, its sense of place and its competitiveness without such imports.

Next week we'll pick up on some of the emerging international research findings regarding pedestrianisation of streets, and then examine where we stand locally.

Regards, Neil


  • Print this Page
  • E-mail this article to a friend
  • Help using Joburg.org.za
  • QUICK LINKS

    CONTACT US
    375-5555 for all your city queries
    375-5911 for emergencies
    E-mail the city